New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Roberta A. Wilson

Immigration Judge, Concord Immigration Court. Appointed November 2023.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Wilson44.1%
Concord court51.4%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
524
Asylum granted
267
Other relief granted
26
Denied
231
Against own court
-7.3 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY24FY25
24%54%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 97% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: India (57.4%), Mexico (15.5%), Peru (6.1%), Nicaragua (3.8%), El Salvador (2.5%).

Official biography

Roberta Wilson was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Wilson ear ned a Bachelor of Science in 2001 from the University of Arizona and a Juris Doctor in 2004 from Arizona State University College of Law. From 2008 to 2023, she practiced immigration law with the Law Office of Monika Sud-Devaraj in Phoenix. During this time from 2009 to 2013, she was the founder and director of JSW Charities, a non-profit organization in Coolidge, Arizona, assi sting children in foster care obtain dependency orders and Special Immigrant Juvenile Status. From 2007 to 2008, she was a private criminal defense attorney with Alcock and Associates. From 2005 to 2007, she served as a public defender with the Pinal County Public Defender's Office in Florence, Arizona. In 2004, she served as a legal intern at the Phoenix Immigration Court. Judge Wilson is a member of the State Bar of Arizona.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at Concord

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.