New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Lettricea L. Jefferson-Webb

Immigration Judge, San Francisco Immigration Court. Appointed March 2022.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Jefferson-Webb34.8%
San Francisco court28.4%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
534
Asylum granted
348
Other relief granted
0
Denied
186
Against own court
+6.4 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY22FY23FY24
8%38%48%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 91% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: India (29.8%), Colombia (15.5%), Guatemala (10.7%), Honduras (10.5%), El Salvador (10.1%).

Official biography

Lettricea Jefferson-Webb was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in March 2022. Judge Jefferson-Webb ear ned a Bachelor of Arts in 1985 from Whittier College in Whittier, California, and a Bachelor of Arts in 1987 from California State University, Long Beach, a Master of Arts in 1993 from Amber University in Garland, Texas, and a Juris Doctor in 1997 from the University of Kentucky College of Law. From 2007 to 2022, she served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky in Louisville. From 2004 to 2007, she served as an Assistant Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Kentucky in Frankfort. From 1999 to 2004, she served as an Assistant Commonwealth Attorney with the Fayette County Commonwealth Attorney's Office, in Lexington, Kentucky. From 1998 to 1999, she was Staff Attorney with the Fayette County Legal Aid Society. Judge Jefferson-Webb is a member of the Kentucky Bar.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at San Francisco

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.