New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Christopher M. Schumann

Immigration Judge, Houston South Gessner Immigration Court. Appointed 1993 by William P. Barr.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Schumann83.9%
Houston - Gessner court82.0%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
763
Asylum granted
36
Other relief granted
87
Denied
640
Against own court
+1.9 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
22%81%84%84%96%60%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 76% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: Honduras (23.7%), Cuba (16.3%), El Salvador (14.7%), Venezuela (12.6%), Guatemala (7.6%).

Official biography

Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Christopher M. Schumann as an Immigration Judgein October 2020. Judge Schumann ear ned a Bachelor of Arts in 1993 from Arizona State University, a Juris Doctor in 1999 from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, and a Masterof Laws in 2005 from the Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School. From 2000 to2020, he was an attorney and a military judge with the U.S. Air Force in the following locations:Yokota Air Base, Japan; Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama; The Pentagon, District of Columbia; Misawa Air Base, Japan; Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada; Royal Air Force,Lakenheath, England; and Travis Air Force Base, California. In October 2020, he retired as acolonel from the U.S. Air Force, having last served as the chief circuit military judge for the Western Circuit. Judge Schumann is a member of the Pennsylvania State Bar.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at Houston - Gessner

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.