New York · est. 2013Thursday, September 24, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Chloe S. Dillon

Immigration Judge, San Francisco Immigration Court. Appointed October 2022.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Dillon4.0%
San Francisco court28.4%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
676
Asylum granted
618
Other relief granted
31
Denied
27
Against own court
-24.4 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY23FY24FY25
1%3%10%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 96% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: India (30.5%), El Salvador (16.6%), Guatemala (12.4%), Mexico (8.9%), Nepal (5.3%).

Official biography

Chloe S. Dillon was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Dillon earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2000 from Dartmouth College, a Master of Arts in 2003 from the University of California at Berkeley, and a Juris Doctor in 2010 from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. From 2012 to 2022, Judge Dillon was a trial attorney at Federal Defenders of San Diego Inc. From 2010 to 2012, she served as an attorney advisor at the Los Angeles Immigration Court. Judge Dillon is a member of the State Bar of California.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

  • Mission Local · 2025-08-01

    Trump admin. fires S.F. immigration judge with high asylum rate

    Reports that the Department of Justice fired Judge Chloe S. Dillon, who had the second-highest asylum clearance rate in San Francisco immigration court (96.5 percent granted, per TRAC data), and that she was outside the standard two-year probationary period for immigration judges.

Other judges at San Francisco

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.