Carrie C. Johnson-Papillo
Immigration Judge, New York/Federal Plaza Immigration Court. Appointed March 2019 by Matthew Whitaker.
Asylum record, FY 2021-2026
TRAC source →- Decisions on the merits
- 1,096
- Asylum granted
- 228
- Other relief granted
- 46
- Denied
- 822
- Against own court
- +27.3 pts
| FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42% | 53% | 53% | 83% | 98% |
Docket
Respondents represented by counsel: 78% (nationally, 81% are represented).
Most common nationalities: China (22.1%), Ecuador (18.8%), India (10.1%), Venezuela (4.7%), Bangladesh (4.7%).
Official biography
Then-Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker appointed Carrie C. Johnson-Papillo to begin supervisory immigration court duties and hearing cases in March 2019. She will oversee the Elizabeth and Newark immigration courts. Judge Johnson-Papillo earned a Bachelor of Arts in2000 from Fairfield University and a Juris Doctor in 2003 from Washington University Schoolof law in Saint Louis. From 2008 to 2018, she served as a deputy chief counsel with the Office of Chief Counsel (OCC), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in New York. From 2005 to 2008, she served as the deputy chief in the Knowledge Management Division, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, ICE, DHS, in Washington D.C. From 2003 to 2005, she served as an assistant chief counsel, OCC, ICE, DHS,first in Newark and later in New York. Judge Johnson-Papillo is a member of the State Bar of New York.
In the record
Yunga-Tenecela v. Attorney General of the United States
Non-precedential Third Circuit opinion names Carrie C. Johnson-Papillo as the immigration judge who denied an adjournment request and concurred with a negative reasonable fear determination against an Ecuadorian woman, reasoning that conflicts of a personal nature do not constitute persecution on account of a protected ground. The court denied the petition for review.
Other judges at New York
Court page →About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.