New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Andrew J. Caborn

Immigration Judge, Conroe Immigration Court. Appointed October 2019 by William P. Barr.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Caborn94.4%
Conroe court84.7%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
267
Asylum granted
5
Other relief granted
10
Denied
252
Against own court
+9.7 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY23FY24FY25FY26
96%95%91%96%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 33% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: Venezuela (15.4%), Colombia (10.1%), Honduras (9.7%), Mauritania (9%), Ecuador (5.6%).

Official biography

Attorney General William Barr appointed Andrew J. Caborn to begin hearing cases in October 2019. Judge Caborn ear ned a Bachelor of Arts in 2002 from California State University, a Juris Doctor in 2007 from Whittier College, and a Master of Laws in 2015 from University of California, Berkeley. From 2015 to 2019, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement,Department of Homeland Security, in San Francisco. From 2013 to 2014, he served as a senior deputy district attorney for the Tulare County District Attorney's Office (TCDA), in Tulare,California. From 2008 to 2013, he served as a deputy district attorney, TCDA, in Tulare,California. In 2008, he worked as an associate attorney at Dapeer Rosenblit and Litvak LLP, in Los Angeles. Judge Caborn is a member of the California State Bar and the Washington State Bar.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at Conroe

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.