Thomas Ayze
Immigration Judge, Miami Immigration Court. Appointed May 2019 by William P. Barr.
Asylum record, FY 2021-2026
TRAC source →- Decisions on the merits
- 898
- Asylum granted
- 107
- Other relief granted
- 39
- Denied
- 752
- Against own court
- +12.2 pts
| FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98% | 81% | 90% | 55% | 83% | 91% |
Docket
Respondents represented by counsel: 91% (nationally, 81% are represented).
Most common nationalities: Nicaragua (19.3%), Brazil (14.7%), Guatemala (12.9%), Honduras (11.9%), Cuba (11.1%).
Official biography
Attorney General William Barr appointed Thomas M. Ayze to begin hearing cases in May 2019.Judge Ayze ear ned a Bachelor of Arts in 1984 from the University of Florida and a Juris Doctorin 1988 from the University of Florida Levin College of Law. He retired as a lieutenant colon eland judge advocate from the U.S. Air Force in 2010. From 2008 to 2019, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, Immigration and Customs Enforcement,Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Miami, Florida. From 2007 to 2008, he served as afraud, detection and national security immigration officer with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), DHS, in Miami, Florida. From 2003 to 2007, he served as an asylum officer with USCIS, DHS, in Miami, Florida. From 1988 to 2010, he was judge advocate in the U.S. Air Force in the following locations: Edwards Air Force Base (AFB), California; Clark Air Base(AB), Philippines; Tyndall AFB, Florida; H.Q. Air Reserve Personnel Center, Denver, Colorado;Elmendorf AFB, Alaska; Yokota AB, Japan; Hurlburt Field, Florida; Air Force Claims Service Center, Ohio; and Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on active duty till 2002, and later as reservist from 2003 to 2010. Judge Ayze is a member of the Colorado Bar and Florida Bar.
In the record
No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.
Other judges at Miami
Court page →About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.