New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Robert K. Lundberg

Immigration Judge, Annandale Immigration Court. Appointed August 2023.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Lundberg85.5%
Annandale court79.6%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
380
Asylum granted
52
Other relief granted
3
Denied
325
Against own court
+5.9 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY25FY26
85%85%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 98% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: Honduras (17.9%), El Salvador (12.9%), Guatemala (11.8%), Bolivia (9.7%), Peru (7.1%).

Official biography

Robert K. Lundberg was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in August 2023. Judge Lundberg ear ned a Bachelor of Arts in 2010 from Arizona State University and a Juris Doctor in 2012 from the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law. From 2021 to 2023, he served as a trial attorney with the Appellate Court Section, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice. From 2018 to 2021, he served as an associate counsel with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Washington, D.C. From 2014 to 2018, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DHS, in Florence, Arizona. From 2013 to 2014, he practiced civil litigation with the Law Firm of Bert Moll in Chandler, Arizona. Judge Lundberg is a member of the State Bar of Arizona.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at Annandale

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.