New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Jamie B. Perry

Immigration Judge, Annandale Immigration Court. Appointed November 2023.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Perry82.8%
Annandale court79.6%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
180
Asylum granted
31
Other relief granted
0
Denied
149
Against own court
+3.2 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY25
83%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 93% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: Bolivia (15.6%), Honduras (15.6%), Guatemala (10.6%), El Salvador (8.3%), Mauritania (6.1%).

Official biography

Jamie B. Perry was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Perry ear ned a Bachelor of Social Work in 2004 and a Master of Social Work in 2005, both from Florida State University, and a Juris Doctor in 2010 from American University, Washington College of Law. In 2023, she was an attorney advisor with the Office on Violence Against Women, Department of Justice (DOJ). From 2015 to 2023, she served as a senior trial attorney with the Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section, Criminal Division, DOJ, and from 2011 to 2015, she served as a trial attorney with the Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section, Criminal Division, DOJ, entering on duty through the Attorney General's Honors Program. From 2010 to 2011, she served as a judicial law clerk for the Honorable Fern Flanagan Saddler, Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Domestic Violence Division. Judge Perry is a member of the Maryland State Bar.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at Annandale

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.