New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

George Pappas

Immigration Judge, Chelmsford Immigration Court. Appointed August 2023.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Pappas51.2%
Chelmsford court62.3%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
166
Asylum granted
60
Other relief granted
21
Denied
85
Against own court
-11.1 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY25
52%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 92% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: Guatemala (33.1%), Brazil (29.5%), Honduras (9.6%), El Salvador (7.2%), Ecuador (3.6%).

Official biography

George D. Pappas was appointed as an immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in August 2023. Judge Pappas ear ned a Bachelor of Science in 1982 from the London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London, a Bachelor of Laws in 1998 from the University of London), a Master of Laws in 2000 from Widener University School of Law, Widener University, and a Doctor of Philosophy in 2014 from Birkbeck School of Law, University of London. From 2003 to 2023, he was principal attorney at George D. Pappas Esq. PC, practic ing immigration, family law, criminal law, and civil litigation. He also provided pro bono legal services to the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (Washington, D.C.), Pair Project (Boston), Latin American Coalition (Charlotte, North Carolina), El Centro (Hendersonville, North Carolina), and True Ridge (Hendersonville, North Carolina). Judge Pappas is a member of the North Carolina State Bar and the Massachusetts Bar.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at Chelmsford

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.