New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Taiyyeba S. Skomra

Immigration Judge, Los Angeles-North Los Angeles St. Immigration Court. Appointed February 2023.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Skomra53.1%
Los Angeles - North court65.4%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
686
Asylum granted
233
Other relief granted
89
Denied
364
Against own court
-12.3 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY23FY24FY25FY26
49%39%39%77%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 87% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: China (34.1%), Guatemala (10.2%), Armenia (8.7%), Russia (8%), Nicaragua (7.1%).

Official biography

Taiyyeba S. Skomra was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in February 2023. Judge Skomra ear ned a Bachelor of Arts in 2000 from Mount Holyoke College and a Juris Doctor in 2005 from the University of Washington School of Law. Since 2015, she has been a certified specialist in Immigration and Nationality Law from the State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization. From 2019 to 2022, she was a partner at SGG Immigration LLP (formerly known as Stone Grzegorek & Gonzalez LLP), and from 2011 to 2018, she was a senior associate at SGG Immigration LLP in Los Angeles. From 2007 to 2011, she practiced immigration law at the Azulay Seiden Law Group in Chicago. In 2006, she practiced immigration law with the Law Offices of Teresita Marsal-Avila in Chicago. Judge Skomra is a member of the State Bar of California.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at Los Angeles - North

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.