New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Andrea Hong

Immigration Judge, Los Angeles-North Los Angeles St. Immigration Court. Appointed January 2020 by William P. Barr.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Hong73.0%
Los Angeles - North court65.4%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
552
Asylum granted
124
Other relief granted
25
Denied
403
Against own court
+7.6 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY24FY25FY26
55%75%76%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 94% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: China (19.4%), Nicaragua (12.9%), Guatemala (11.1%), El Salvador (10.7%), Russia (10.1%).

Official biography

Attorney General Barr appointed Andrea H. Hong to begin hearing cases in January 2020. Judge Hong ear ned a Bachelor of Science in 1996 from Case Western Reserve University and a Juris Doctor in 1999 from the University of Akron, School of Law. From 2009 to 2019, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Los Angeles. From 2006 to 2009, she served as a deputy district attorney with the Riverside County District Attorney's Office, in Riverside, California. From 2001 to 2004, she served as an assistant prosecutor with the Summit County Prosecutor's Office, in Akron, Ohio. From 1999 to 2001, she served as an assistant city prosecutor with the Akron City Prosecutor's Office, in Akron, Ohio. Judge Hong is a member of the State Bar of California.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at Los Angeles - North

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.