New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Nicole Lane

Immigration Judge, Newark Immigration Court. Appointed August 2022.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Lane83.3%
Newark court70.3%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
1,339
Asylum granted
111
Other relief granted
112
Denied
1,116
Against own court
+13.0 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY23FY24FY25FY26
59%76%74%94%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 72% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: Ecuador (29.7%), Peru (24.3%), Colombia (16.7%), Brazil (5.7%), Guatemala (4.7%).

Official biography

Nicole A. Lane was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in August 2022. Judge Lane ear ned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from the State University of New York at Albany and a Juris Doctor in 1999 from the George Washington University Law School. From 2018 to 2022, she served as an assistant director at the New York State Adjudication Services Office. From 2012 to 2018, she served as a senior Administrative Law Judge, and from 2008 to 2012, she served as an Administrative Law Judge at the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. From 2005 to 2008, she was a director of public affairs at New York City Health and Hospitals in Harlem, New York, and worked as a public policy analyst prior to that. Judge Lane is a member of the New Jersey State Bar and New York State Bar, and is admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at Newark

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.