New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Mark Whitworth

Immigration Judge, Houston - Greenspoint Park. Appointed April 2021.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Whitworth82.7%
Houston - Greenspoint court89.4%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
220
Asylum granted
23
Other relief granted
15
Denied
182
Against own court
-6.7 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY22FY23
84%79%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 86% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: Honduras (40.9%), El Salvador (34.5%), Guatemala (9.1%), Mexico (8.2%), Venezuela (4.1%).

Official biography

Mark R. Whitworth was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in April 2021. Judge Whitworth ear ned a Bachelor of Journalism in 1985 and a Juris Doctor in 1993, both from the University of Texas at Austin. From 2003 to 2021, he served as an Assistant Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement,Department of Homeland Security, in Harlingen, Texas. From 2001 to 2003, he served as an Assistant District Counsel with the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Justice, in Harlingen. From 1994 to 2001, he served as an Assistant Attorney General and an Assistant Managing Assistant Attorney General for the Texas Office of the Attorney General, in Harlingen. From 1993 to 1994, he was an Associate Attorneywith Roerig, Oliveira and Fisher LLP, in Brownsville, Texas. Judge Whitworth is a member ofthe State Bar of Texas.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at Houston - Greenspoint

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.