Jeb Terrien
Immigration Judge, Boston Immigration Court. Appointed April 2021.
Asylum record, FY 2021-2026
TRAC source →- Decisions on the merits
- 237
- Asylum granted
- 66
- Other relief granted
- 4
- Denied
- 167
- Against own court
- +17.9 pts
| FY22 | FY23 |
|---|---|
| 60% | 80% |
Docket
Respondents represented by counsel: 99% (nationally, 81% are represented).
Most common nationalities: Guatemala (27%), El Salvador (18.6%), Honduras (11.8%), Brazil (10.5%), Ecuador (6.3%).
Official biography
Jeb. T. Terrien was appointed as a Unit Chief Immigration Judge to begin supervisory immigration adjudication center duties and hearing cases in April 2021. Judge Terrien ear ned a Bachelor of Science in 1994 from The University of Virginia and a Juris Doctor in 1997 from Tulane Law School. From 2009 to 2021, he served as a Managing Assistant U.S. Attorney and Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Virginia, in Harrisonburg. During that time,from 2014 to 2015, he served as an Assistant Director, National Advocacy Center, Office of Legal Education, Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, Department of Justice, in Columbia,South Carolina. From 2004 to 2008, he served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, in Cincinnati, and the Northern District of West Virginia, in Martinsburg. From2000 to 2004, he served as a Regional Drug Prosecutor for the Commonwealth of Virginia in Halifax, Charlotte, and Campbell Counties. From 1999 to 2000, he served as an Assistant Attorney General with the Virginia Attorney General's Office, in Richmond. From 1998 to 1999,he served as an Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney for the Accomack County Commonwealth's Attorney's Office in Accomac, Virginia. Judge Terrien is a member of the Virginia State Bar.
In the record
No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.
Other judges at Boston
Court page →About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.