Ana Lorena Quiros
Immigration Judge, Hyattsville Immigration Court. Appointed November 2024.
Asylum record, FY 2021-2026
TRAC source →- Decisions on the merits
- 455
- Asylum granted
- 112
- Other relief granted
- 11
- Denied
- 332
- Against own court
- +15.4 pts
| FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|
| 69% | 80% |
Docket
Respondents represented by counsel: 73% (nationally, 81% are represented).
Most common nationalities: Honduras (13.2%), Guatemala (13%), Cameroon (12.1%), El Salvador (11.6%), Venezuela (11.6%).
Official biography
Ana Lorena Quiros was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2024. Judge Quiros ear ned a Bachelor of Science in 1994 from the University of Miami and a Juris Doctor in 2001 from Nova Southeastern University with a Certificate of International Concentration. From 2021 to 2024, she was in private practice as the president at the law firm Quiros Law PLLC in Florida, where she represented noncitizens before EOIR and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Department of Homeland Security (DHS). From 2019 to 2021, she served as an asylum officer, Refugee Asylum and International Operations Directorate, USCIS, DHS in Miami. From 2017 to 2019, she was a mana ging attorney for Catholic Charities Legal Services of the Archdiocese of Miami (CCLS) in the following roles: director for the New American Defender Program (2017-2021) and director of the Citizenship & Immigration Reform Programs (2015-2021). From 2015 to 2017, she worked as a staff attorney at CCLS. From 2003 to 2015, she was in private practice as a solo practitioner and later partner at Russell, Quiros PA. From 2001 to 2003, she worked as a staff attorney for CCLS in Miami. Judge Quiros is a member of the Florida Bar.
In the record
No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.
Other judges at Hyattsville
Court page →About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.