Week of January 15–21, 2025

President Biden has issued an executive order suspending the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) due to the overwhelming influx of migrants over the past four years. This suspension, effective January 27, 2025, acknowledges the strain on U.S. communities, including cities like New York, Chicago, and smaller towns across the country, which have called for federal assistance to manage the growing number of arrivals. The order emphasizes the need to protect American resources, safety, and the ability to assimilate refugees effectively into society.

The U.S. government now aims to prioritize national security and public safety, admitting only those refugees who can fully assimilate. It also mandates that state and local jurisdictions be more involved in decisions regarding refugee placements, ensuring these communities have a say in resettlement processes.

The Secretary of Homeland Security is instructed to suspend decisions on refugee applications until further review. However, exceptions will be made for cases where admitting a refugee aligns with U.S. national interests and security. Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with other government agencies, will evaluate whether increased state involvement in refugee resettlement is feasible.

The executive order also revokes a previous one from 2021, shifting policy priorities regarding refugee resettlement. A review will be conducted every 90 days to determine if the program should resume, with ongoing assessments of its alignment with U.S. interests.

As of 2023, the United States is home to 47.1 million immigrants, with 22.4 million noncitizens and 24.7 million naturalized citizens, making up approximately 7% of the total population. Immigrants often live in mixed-status families, with both citizens and noncitizens. One in four children in the U.S. has an immigrant parent, including 12% who have at least one noncitizen parent.

Health coverage remains a significant challenge for immigrants. Among noncitizens, half of likely undocumented adults and 18% of lawfully present immigrants were uninsured in 2023, compared to just 6% of naturalized citizens and 8% of U.S.-born citizens. Noncitizens face barriers to health insurance, including limited access to employer-provided benefits and eligibility restrictions for federal programs like Medicaid, CHIP, and the ACA Marketplace. Those eligible still face challenges such as fear, confusion about eligibility, and language barriers. This results in higher uninsured rates and delays in seeking medical care.

Some states have expanded Medicaid and CHIP coverage for lawfully present immigrants, and a few states have extended coverage to low-income individuals regardless of status. However, many, particularly undocumented immigrants, remain ineligible for coverage. Under the Biden administration, changes to public charge rules have helped alleviate fears, but concerns persist, especially among undocumented immigrants who worry that using health services could impact their immigration status. The potential reinstatement of stricter policies under the next Trump administration may increase these fears, further limiting immigrants' access to health care.

Washington, DC – On January 20, 2025, Kelli Stump, President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), and Ben Johnson, AILA Executive Director, responded to the executive orders announced during President Trump's inauguration speech.

Stump expressed concern over Trump’s proposed “bold actions” regarding border and immigration issues. She argued that, without more details, these actions could undermine the immigration system crucial to the nation’s prosperity. Stump highlighted the lower border numbers compared to when Trump last left office and criticized his plan to declare a “border emergency” and deploy the U.S. military to the southern border. She feared this could politicize the military and threaten the prohibition on using military force domestically. Stump also opposed Trump’s intention to end refugee resettlement, calling it a step back from America’s commitment to welcoming vulnerable individuals and families.

Johnson, AILA Executive Director, echoed Stump’s concerns, emphasizing that the American public desires real solutions, not harsh measures. He cited polling data showing a public rejection of mass deportations, with the Wall Street Journal reporting public opposition to such policies. Johnson warned that reintroducing harmful policies like “Remain in Mexico” would undermine due process and asylum laws, potentially endangering lives. He also criticized Trump’s proposal to end birthright citizenship, which he described as a constitutional overreach. AILA members and experts are set to analyze the written orders in the coming days to assess their full impact.

WASHINGTON (AP) — On Monday, President Donald Trump unveiled a series of executive orders aimed at strengthening security along the southern border, fulfilling his longstanding promise to crack down on immigration. The orders, which began taking effect immediately after his inauguration, include policies from his previous administration and new measures to address immigration.

Among the revived policies are measures requiring asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico and completing the construction of the border wall. Trump also introduced controversial strategies, such as ending automatic citizenship for those born in the U.S. and eliminating the CBP One app, which had been used by nearly a million migrants to enter the country. The app had been a critical part of the Biden administration’s approach, providing a legal pathway for migrants while tightening restrictions on illegal entry.

The swift implementation of these orders has already caused significant changes, including the cancellation of scheduled appointments for migrants using the app. Mexico has also agreed to allow asylum seekers to remain on its side of the border while their cases are processed.

During his inauguration speech, Trump declared a national emergency at the border, vowing to halt all illegal entry and begin deporting millions of undocumented immigrants. His policies have sparked intense debate, with supporters claiming they restore order, while critics argue they fuel more migration. Migrants like Melanie Mendoza, who had been waiting for an appointment, now face uncertainty about their future.

The passing of the 39th U.S. president, Jimmy Carter, has prompted reflections on his significant contributions to immigration policy. Carter’s presidency marked a pivotal era for humanitarian immigration initiatives, leaving lasting reforms that continue to shape the nation's approach to immigration and refugee resettlement.

One of Carter's most notable actions was the establishment of the modern refugee resettlement system, reflecting his commitment to human rights as a guiding principle of American foreign policy. His administration responded to the Indochina refugee crisis by using humanitarian parole, admitting 360,000 refugees from Laos, Vietnam, and Cambodia. The Orderly Departure Program (ODP), initiated under Carter's leadership, created a legal route for Vietnamese migrants, resettling over 500,000 people in the U.S.

Carter also signed the Refugee Act of 1980 into law, bridging gaps between international refugee protections and U.S. law. This law established a standard for granting refugee status, ensuring a humane response to global refugee crises and reaffirming America's commitment to human rights.

At the same time, Carter's administration confronted rising unauthorized migration, particularly from Cuba and Haiti. The Cuban-Haitian Entrant Act of 1980 addressed the inequitable treatment of Cuban and Haitian migrants, offering a pathway to legal status for those affected by the Mariel boatlift.

Carter’s policies, while focused on humanitarian concerns, also laid the groundwork for broader immigration reform. His leadership and vision contributed to the development of a balanced and more humane immigration system, influencing future debates and legislative actions.

"We stand with our partners in the immigrants’ rights movement and the communities we represent to push back against an administration emboldened to launch even more repressive and extremist attacks.”

San Francisco, CA — Today, President Donald Trump issued a series of executive orders on immigration, including declaring a national emergency and implementing measures to increase deportations, expand detention, and attempt to end birthright citizenship. Following the signing of these orders, Earthjustice President Abigail Dillen released a statement condemning the actions.

“President Trump’s executive actions on immigration will devastate communities, create fear across the nation, and result in widespread civil rights violations and humanitarian harm,” Dillen said. “We saw the damage caused during Trump’s first administration, from the separation of families to the detention of young children in makeshift prisons. His efforts to dismantle the nation’s asylum system were deeply harmful, and these new actions promise even more extreme and repressive measures.”

Dillen emphasized Earthjustice’s commitment to standing with partners in the immigrant rights movement and the communities impacted by these policies. She expressed opposition to the administration’s escalating attacks on immigrants and vowed to continue fighting against measures that undermine the rights and dignity of immigrant families.

The executive orders represent a further shift in immigration policy, with sweeping measures that critics argue will deepen divisions, exacerbate fear, and escalate injustices against vulnerable populations. Earthjustice and other advocates have vowed to push back against these policies through legal challenges and advocacy efforts to protect immigrant communities and uphold human rights.

SAN FRANCISCO – California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced new bulletins and updated guidance to support state and local law enforcement, prosecutors, and defense counsel in ensuring compliance with state laws as California prepares for potential challenges to its immigrant communities. These updates include a revised information bulletin on Senate Bill (SB) 54, known as “the California Values Act,” which limits state and local involvement in immigration enforcement, in anticipation of increased federal activity under the incoming administration.

Additionally, Bonta released updated resources on hate crimes to assist law enforcement and prosecutors in addressing potential violence against immigrants, spurred by xenophobic rhetoric from the President-elect. New guidance for prosecutors and defense counsel was also issued to ensure defendants fully understand the immigration consequences of plea deals.

“While the President-elect spreads xenophobic rhetoric and plans harmful mass deportations, California remains committed to protecting our communities,” said Attorney General Bonta. “No matter who holds office in Washington, California will continue to lead with its values. We will not allow our public safety resources to be diverted for federal immigration enforcement.”

Bonta emphasized the importance of trust between law enforcement and immigrant communities, ensuring that people feel safe reporting crimes and seeking assistance. With these new and updated policies, California is reinforcing its commitment to protecting immigrant rights and upholding the rights of all residents under both state and federal law.

Washington (CNN) — Donald Trump’s team is finalizing a series of immigration executive orders aimed at initiating a crackdown that will have widespread consequences for immigrants across the country. These actions, which are expected to be unveiled shortly after the president-elect is sworn in, mark a significant shift in U.S. immigration policy.

The plan includes Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sweeps in major U.S. cities, increased Pentagon resources at the U.S.-Mexico border, and additional restrictions on who can enter the U.S. The Trump administration will also roll back policies enacted during the Biden era. Sources indicate that initial deportation efforts will focus on undocumented immigrants with criminal backgrounds in cities like Washington, DC, Denver, and Chicago, though others encountered during these operations could also be detained.

Key figures in Trump’s immigration team include South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, who is slated for confirmation as homeland security secretary, and Stephen Miller, the incoming deputy chief of staff for policy. “You cannot be a safe or secure country until the border is protected and defended,” Miller stated, emphasizing the need to combat illegal immigration as a top national security priority.

In addition to ramping up enforcement, Trump’s team is considering significant measures such as ending birthright citizenship and reviewing the applicability of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. Early actions will include a national emergency declaration to bolster border security, a proclamation suspending certain border entries, and the potential cancellation of a humanitarian parole program, impacting migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.

Oregon is bracing for significant changes to its immigration landscape with President-elect Donald Trump set to retake office. The state is home to approximately 120,000 undocumented immigrants, according to 2022 estimates from the Pew Research Center, as well as many others living under different designations, such as asylum seekers, H-1B visa workers, and international students. Oregon also boasts one of the most extensive sanctuary laws in the U.S., which could be challenged by the incoming administration.

A recent poll revealed that many Americans now view immigration as a top issue, with Trump promising aggressive enforcement measures and mass deportations. In Oregon, 18% of voters listed immigration as their top concern, and 90% of those voters supported Trump, signaling potential challenges for the state’s immigrant population.

The new administration’s immigration policies could have far-reaching impacts in Oregon, affecting asylum seekers, international students, public schools, and universities. Companies that rely on visa holders and the state’s legal system may also feel the consequences. With Trump’s emphasis on stricter immigration controls, the future of Oregon’s immigrant communities remains uncertain. These developments could lead to heightened fear and disruption for tens of thousands of people living and working in the state, especially as the administration is expected to ramp up enforcement efforts. Oregon’s sanctuary laws and the support for immigrant communities will likely be tested in the months to come.

The U.S. Senate has advanced the Laken Riley Act, which would mandate the expansion of mass detention for immigrants charged or arrested for property crimes, moving it closer to becoming law under President-elect Donald Trump. The bill, named after a young nursing student murdered by an undocumented immigrant with a prior shoplifting charge, passed the Senate with a 61-35 vote. It already passed the House and is set to be one of Trump’s first legislative wins.

The bill aims to broaden mandatory detention for immigrants facing property crime charges, including those involved in assaults on law enforcement. The legislation also gives state attorneys general broader legal standing to challenge federal law. Despite bipartisan support, including 10 Senate Democrats, the bill has drawn criticism from both Democrats and immigration experts. They warn that it could detain not only undocumented individuals but also those with legal status, potentially affecting children and complicating visa issuance.

Immigration attorneys also express concerns over the bill’s cost, with estimates of $26.9 billion for the first year of implementation, a significant increase compared to the $9 billion ICE’s 2024 budget. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and some Democrats have opposed the measure, calling for more amendments and debate. Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader John Thune supports additional funding for ICE to implement the law, signaling ongoing discussions on enforcement capacity. The bill remains contentious as it moves forward, with significant implications for the U.S. immigration system.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate has passed the Laken Riley Act, marking the first major immigration-related legislation under President Donald Trump’s administration. The bill requires federal authorities to detain migrants accused of theft and violent crimes, a significant step in Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration. The measure passed with a 64-35 vote, including support from 12 Senate Democrats, reflecting bipartisan backing for Trump’s immigration agenda.

Named after Laken Riley, a Georgia nursing student murdered by a Venezuelan immigrant, the bill has become a symbol of Trump’s tough stance on immigration. The passage of the bill signals a shift to more aggressive border security and law enforcement policies. Just minutes after the Senate vote, Trump signed a series of executive orders to further his immigration goals.

The bill, which now heads back to the Republican-controlled House for approval, expands detention requirements to include immigrants accused of assaulting police officers or committing crimes that result in death or serious injury. This change came after the Senate made revisions to the original version passed in the House earlier this month.

Trump has consistently emphasized the need to prioritize deportation and strengthen border security, and this bill represents an early victory for his administration’s immigration policies. The passage of the Laken Riley Act is expected to be one of the first of many measures aimed at curbing illegal immigration and deporting individuals with criminal records.

Washington — On his first day back in the White House, President Trump wasted no time invoking powerful executive powers to initiate a wide-ranging crackdown on immigration. The actions marked a sharp shift in U.S. immigration policies, reflecting Trump’s long-held stance on securing the southern border and reducing illegal immigration.

Among the measures taken, Trump ordered the deployment of military forces to assist with border enforcement, a move aimed at strengthening security. He also directed his administration to designate criminal cartels and gangs as terrorist organizations, giving federal agencies enhanced tools to combat organized crime.

One of the most controversial steps was the suspension of asylum and refugee admissions. Trump’s executive order sought to limit entry for individuals seeking refuge in the U.S., effectively halting many asylum claims. Additionally, the president attempted to terminate birthright citizenship, aiming to end the automatic granting of citizenship to children born on U.S. soil to undocumented immigrants.

These actions align with Trump’s rhetoric from his presidential campaign, where he consistently vowed to tackle illegal immigration aggressively. However, many of these executive actions are expected to face significant legal challenges in the courts, where opponents argue they could violate constitutional rights.

In his inaugural address, Trump stated, “As commander in chief, I have no higher responsibility than to defend our country from threats and invasions, and that is what I’m going to do,” setting the tone for his administration's immigration policies.

Raids aimed at detaining and deporting undocumented migrants in the U.S. are set to begin on the first full day of President-elect Donald Trump’s administration, according to sources close to the operation. The raids, initially expected to start in Chicago—a city with a large immigrant population—have sparked controversy, especially after details of the plan were leaked. Tom Homan, Trump's "border tsar," clarified that while Chicago had been mentioned, deportations would target individuals across the country, prioritizing those involved in criminal activities and gang membership.

Homan stated that the operations, which will be conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), would not be "raids" but rather "targeted enforcement operations," designed to apprehend individuals known to pose public safety or national security threats. While ICE has long conducted deportations, Trump’s administration plans to intensify efforts, potentially leading to daily deportation flights in the first week of his presidency.

Trump’s promise of large-scale deportations has received broad public support, with recent polls showing 55% of Americans backing such measures. These operations will focus on so-called "sanctuary cities," where local authorities limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. Cities like New York, Los Angeles, Denver, and Miami are also expected to be targeted.

Although initial deportations will focus on criminals, ICE is prepared to arrest and deport undocumented individuals regardless of their criminal history, increasing concerns among immigrant communities. The plan also includes resuming raids at construction sites, which were suspended under the Biden administration.

State and local leaders across the U.S. are preparing for aggressive immigration policies and potential mass deportations following President Donald Trump's inauguration. Trump vowed to sign nearly 100 executive orders on Day 1, with at least 10 focused on immigration, an issue central to his campaign. Among the first actions he signed was an executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship, a constitutional issue that would require legal challenges or amendments. Trump also declared a national emergency at the U.S.-Mexico border, allowing the deployment of additional military resources to complete the border wall.

In his inaugural speech, Trump reiterated his commitment to mass deportations, stating, "We will begin the process of returning millions and millions of criminal aliens back to the places from which they came." These sweeping actions are expected to create uncertainty and fear in immigrant communities, with many local leaders and citizens unsure of how to respond if Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) comes to their door.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) immediately filed a lawsuit against the administration’s move to shut down a border app, CBP One, that allowed migrants to seek asylum. Additionally, the ACLU and civil rights groups are challenging Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship, claiming it violates federal law and the Constitution.

While many states are bracing for the crackdown, Republican governors have expressed strong support for Trump's stance on illegal immigration, with some even offering to deploy National Guard resources to aid enforcement.

President Donald Trump’s first day in office was marked by a series of sweeping immigration actions, including declaring a national emergency at the U.S. southern border, halting the use of the CBP One border app, and initiating the process to end birthright citizenship. These moves are expected to spark legal battles, particularly the challenge to birthright citizenship, which many legal experts say will need to be addressed through the courts or a constitutional amendment.

In addition to these executive actions, Trump made a significant personnel change by removing senior leadership at the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), which oversees the nation’s immigration courts. The officials removed, including Chief Immigration Judge Sheila McNulty and others, had served in their roles for years, raising concerns about whether their dismissal followed proper procedures. These removals underscore the Trump administration’s push to place allies in key positions to carry out its immigration agenda.

The decision to shut down the CBP One app, which had been used by migrants to apply for entry into the U.S., further escalates the administration’s stance on immigration. Homeland Security officials had cited the app as an effective tool to reduce migrant crossings by allowing a more organized way for people to apply for entry. With its termination, along with new asylum restrictions, the southern border is effectively closed to asylum seekers, representing a dramatic shift in U.S. immigration policy.