New York · est. 2013Friday, September 4, 2026
Inside Immigration

Plain-language guides to US immigration, asylum and USCIS procedure.

Immigration judges

Teresa L. Riley

Immigration Judge, Cleveland Immigration Court. Appointed May 2019 by William P. Barr.

Asylum record, FY 2021-2026

TRAC source →
Judge Riley80.4%
Cleveland court79.2%
All judges nationally62.9%
Decisions on the merits
515
Asylum granted
71
Other relief granted
30
Denied
414
Against own court
+1.2 pts
Denial rate by fiscal year
FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
89%78%80%54%91%87%

Read from TRAC's chart to the nearest point. Years with fewer than 25 decisions are not shown.

Docket

Respondents represented by counsel: 90% (nationally, 81% are represented).

Most common nationalities: Guatemala (23.9%), Honduras (14%), El Salvador (12.4%), Brazil (8.3%), Mexico (6%).

Official biography

Attorney General William Barr appointed Teresa L. Riley to begin hearing cases in May 2019.Judge Riley ear ned a Bachelor of Science in 1997 from the University of Akron, and a Juris Doctor in 2002 from the University of Akron School of Law. From 2009 to 2019, she served asan assistant U.S. attorney, Northern District of Ohio, Department of Justice, in both the Cleveland and Akron offices finishing her service as the Attorney-in-Charge, Criminal Division,of the Akron Branch Office. From 2008 to 2009, she served as an assistant prosecuting attorney for the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office in Cleveland, Ohio. From 2003 to 2008, she serve das the senior law clerk in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio. From 1999 to 2003,she served as a law clerk and judicial attorney for Judge John R. Adams in the Court of Common Pleas in Summit County, Ohio. Judge Riley is a member of the Ohio Bar.

As published by the Executive Office for Immigration Review at appointment, via TRAC.

In the record

No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.

Other judges at Cleveland

Court page →

About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.