James T. Dehn
Immigration Judge, Sterling Immigration Court. Appointed August 2022.
Asylum record, FY 2021-2026
TRAC source →- Decisions on the merits
- 638
- Asylum granted
- 175
- Other relief granted
- 24
- Denied
- 439
- Against own court
- -2.8 pts
| FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28% | 33% | 64% | 86% |
Docket
Respondents represented by counsel: 81% (nationally, 81% are represented).
Most common nationalities: Honduras (26.5%), El Salvador (23.2%), Guatemala (12.4%), Peru (6.6%), Venezuela (6.6%).
Official biography
James T. Dehn was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in August 2022. Judge Dehn ear ned a Bachelor of Arts in 1995 from George Mason University, a Master of Arts in 1998 from the Syracuse University Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, and a Juris Doctor in 1998 from the Syracuse College of Law. From 2020 to 2022, he served as the Chief Appellate Counsel at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Washington, D.C. From 2019 to 2020, he served as an attorney advisor at the Office of Chief Counsel, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in Washington, D.C. From 2005 to 2019, he served as an attorney advisor at the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, ICE, in Washington, D.C. Also, from 2007 to 2011, he served as a government appellate counsel, and from 2002 to 2006, as a trial defense counsel, in the U.S. Army Reserve, Judge Advocate General's Corps, National Capital Region. From 2000 to 2005, he served as an attorney advisor at the Office of General Counsel, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, in Washington, D.C. From 1998 to 1999, he was an associate attorney at Whelan, DeMaio & Kiszkiel PA, in Miami. Judge Dehn is a member of the Maryland State Bar.
In the record
No published reporting or appellate decisions naming this judge have been collected yet.
Other judges at Sterling
Court page →About these figures. Denial rates describe outcomes in the cases a judge happened to hear, which differ by detention, nationality and representation. They are not a measure of fairness or competence. Method and sources are on the judges index.